King Lear and Existentialism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

King Lear and Existentialism - Essay Examplees many aspects such(prenominal) as our birth and our existence in the world, realization of human bandageage, and the experience of elementary emotions such as fear, love and hate and the feeling of anguish. Shakespeares King Lear deals with the existence in its barest sense and is forced to conk accustomed to that existence. Thus in King Lear the tragic story of a king is depicted who alone fails in his judgment. The daughters whom he thought they love him forsaken him and taken away his kingdom and his power. And the daughter who genuinely loved him and cared him was banished by him.The arse about is real sense a wise and sensible character and he knows the fatuity of the universe. He is also aware of the kings ignorance towards his existence. The fool also knows that there is no construct of justice in the absurd universe. When Lear is appealing God that the cruel disloyal and un-virtuous people may be punished the fool knows that there is no use of this appealing. The king is appealing this in his anxiety. The presence of Edgar and the fool is rather a medium for Lears progression. Lear is suffering from complete loneliness and isolation as he is abandoned by love and cosseted from all emotions. As far as existentialism is concerned it poop be said that Lear existentialism is different at the beginning and at the end. In the beginning when he is having all the might and authority he gets pleasure from the flattery by the villainous characters and at that period he is proud of his existence. He is the matter of respect for everybody. He is praised by everybody. But he is shock when his pride is shattered by his loyal and faithful daughter Cordelia. Of course Cordelia is honest and trying to involve him out of the illusion. When Lear asks Cordelia how much she loves him and Cordelia in contrast to the flattery done by her elder sisters, she answers,According to my bond no more nor less. (Act I, Scene i) Thi s answer is an insult for the supreme monarch of