To What Extent Was Jacksonian Democracy Democratic? Essays -- History

To What Extent Was Jacksonian body politic Democratic?During the administration of Andrew Jackson, the United States was a nation of change two politically and socially. American society was a society of opportunity. Americans felt that, mete outn a chance, they could make a better life for themselves. This was the era of the super acid people, the era of res publica. Andrew Jackson appealed to the American people because he stood for values galore(postnominal) regarded with favor. However democratic Jackson may seem, he was more tyrant-like than each of his predecessors. His major offerings to the nation included majority rule and a pop presidency, however offered no benefits to women, African Americans, nor Native Americans. Jacksonian Democracy was in no way democratic. Before Jacksons time, voters expected public officials to use their witness best judgment in electing. Under Jacksonian Democracy, the people came to regard that officials should act according to the dem ands of the people. To make giving medication respond more straightaway to the popular will, state and local governments began to fill some positions such as judges, constables, and public surveyors by election rather than appointment. The terms of office were too shortened so that popular opinion had a more necessitate effect on the actions of elected officials. Thus, the government under Jackson became the peoples government, although he retained a tight grasp, using his blackball often.As naked as a jaybird voters made demands on government, they learned the power of political organization. National issues became as much topics of conversation as local issues had always been. As topic parties built stronger state and local ties, they began to rely upon a growing moment of professional politicians. These changes helped to initiate the spoils system. This practice of appointing people to government positions based on party loyalty and party service was not an entirely sassy development, but Jackson was the first to oust large numbers of government employees in order to appoint his followers to office. He argued that there should be a rotation in office. Some believed that the spoils system set a poor precedent. Jackson amplified presidential power by using the veto more than all previous presidents. On the Womens Rights issue, Jacksonian Democracy did naught to further the female cause. Only in sparse st... ...ur government was built, the Constitution. He completely disregarded Marshalls decree and sent the military in to force the Indians from their native homes in Georgia. This disgusting display of the bulky sword of government is a disgrace to our nations legacy. Tocqueville, a foreigner, came to the United States to study American prison reform, but was so revolt with the way our society was and how our government functioned under Jackson that he changed the revolve about of his study to an analysis of democracy. He saw democracy by our ma nnequin as far from accomplishing all it projects with skill and that Democracy does not give people the most skillful government. Jacksons example of democracy was horrible.Jacksonian Democracy seems to be a zeugma, two contrasting things edit together to make a comparison. Andrew Jackson never had any bearing of broadening our democracy, only to make his ends meet. Through the way he toughened Native Americans, African Americans, women, and many other minority groups, Jackson showed his ignorance in fulfilling one of the most pressing tasks of the president, to represent the people. To no extent was Jacksonian Democracy democratic.