Describe what can happen in the society without law, especially in the field of business Essay

Fraus omnia corrumpit(theory of takeoff), according to which one evoke never rely on a fraudulent act to justify the application of a command of law to its own professional personfit. The scope of application, the conditions of application, and the sanctioned effects thereof allow for be defined, since they are subject of debate. Further, the relation between the principle Fraus omnia corrumpit and other concepts or usual principles of law will be examined.For this, the discussed principle can fulfil three possible give-up the ghosts (with each time different legal effects) a mere explanatory function for other concepts of law a corrective mechanism which excludes the application of dominates of law in case of fraud or the function of a fully autonomous concept of law.The leave behinds of this query will provide a new insight into the role of general principles of private law in the hierarchy of sources of law. The correct scope and function of the principle Fraus omnia c orrumpit are still uncertain in law ascribable to a lack of fundamental research, contrary to other systems of law. Innovative research (according to internal and external comparative law and a functional-inductive approach) will result in fixing the contours of this principle, which will lead to higher legal certainty. Non bis in idem,Ne bis in idem, which translates literally from Latin as not double in the same thing, is a legal doctrine to the effect that no legal action can be instituted twice for the same come of action. It is a legal concept originating in Roman Civil Law, scarce it is essentially the equivalent of the double jeopardy (autrefois acquit) doctrine found in common law jurisdictions. In dubio pro reoThe principle of in dubio pro reo (Latin for when in dubiety, for the criminate) means that a defendant may not be convicted by the court when doubts about his or her guilt remain. It is frequently used specifically to refer to the principle of presumption of innocence that dictates that when a criminal statute allows more than one interpretation, the one that favours the defendant should be chosen.The Latin phase in dubio pro reo translates as in doubt, for the accused. A more expanded definition is that courts andjuries must take the side of an accused party when there are doubts about the charges. This is connected to reasonable doubt and to presumed innocence, which are a foundational part of many justice systems. It also affects the rule of lenity, when judges must make interpretive decisions about ambiguous laws in favor of someone who is accused.