To my understanding, and from what I ca-ca read in the book and passim the course links, I believe that the intent of the Homestead affect was to defeat land monopoly. Many farmers, however, lacked the economic means to apparent operation west and manage a farm. . By this, fewer lock in understood the new type of agriculture, in which technology was use to farm the land that the Great Plains required. Instead, speculators and corporate interests were able to guide in profits, and fraud and corruption, and often marked the process tillage for transportation (the rail lines). The Homestead Acts biggest weakness however, was non taking into account statement conditions on the frontier. I also think that the eastern framers did not consider that some of their land was too large for irrigated ground and too small for dry farming. The role of the private not bad(p) in the American westward was towards the rich. The poor individuals did not have any control of most of the land even if they were the premier occupants. The rich people were also in control of the railroad system, in which the well to do folks had the only verbalize so.
Farmers finally received a break, with the railroads. Under the Pacific squeeze Act, land grants made possible the speedy construction of the merger Pacific, Central Pacific, Northern Pacific, Santa Fe, and Southern Pacific railroads.
They were Lead by railroad promoters to believe in a bountiful West harvest, in which mass amounts of European immigrants were caught up in the movement West. I think that the railroads provided exactly what the Homestead Acts did not: attribute terms, good quality advertisement, larger land tracts, special rider rates, and farming support for future Western settlers. There were a lot of motivated businessmen of the Great Northern Railway, who planned...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment